It would appear to be a portrait, uncannily accurate when matched against the gospel accounts of Jesus of Nazareth, and indeed some believe that this stretch of ivory linen is the very cloth that Joseph of Arimathaea placed under and over the body of Jesus ... Where and how he got the relic, no one knows although there was talk of "spoil of battle".A chronicler of the fourth crusade, Robert de Clari, had written of seeing in For reasons that are somewhat murky, de Charny's granddaughter, Marguerite, surrendered her prize possession to Luis, Duke of Savoy, in 1453. The shroud, from then to this day, has belonged to the house of in 1532, takes on special significance today. Before the shroud was rushed to safety, drops of molten silver from its casket dropped on the cloth and severely charred some of the corners of the folds. The twin lines of scars and the water stains from the 1532 fire dominated.They have, however, only once allowed the Shroud to be subjected to a thorough scientific examination. The results of that examination, conducted by a neutral and illustrious army of experts, were overwhelmingly positive pointing toward genuineness.
Shy of a date stamp on an object, it is still the best and most accurate of dating techniques devised.This could then undermine the believers faith in the Lord and in the Church leadership.The path they have apparently chosen is to leave the question open while not appearing to be adverse to attempts at scientific assessment.All living things exchange the gas Carbon 14 (C14) with the atmosphere around them—animals and plants exchange Carbon 14 with the atmosphere, fish and corals exchange carbon with dissolved C14 in the water.
Throughout the life of an animal or plant, the amount of C14 is perfectly balanced with that of its surroundings. The C14 in a dead organism slowly decays at a known rate: its "half life".
Archaeologists use the remains of the past to help solve the puzzles of history.